From the category archives:

Election '08

palin.jpg

What a whirlwind in the Presidential election ‘08! Obama, sorry fellow Republicans, he did great last night whether we like it or not. There were a few times the conflict between his “change” theme but still propping up liberal culture war talking points made me groan. However, Obama is a statesman. He knows how to talk and compel people in a way we haven’t seen in a long time.

and McCain? … wowsers!

I think his pick of Sarah Palin was an *amazing* move. I have only seen her a few times but was impressed with her each time. I have slowly, but increasingly, been getting enthused with the McCain campaign. Now, I am totally energized.

Somebody on Fox News said this was like a great novel. I totally agree… GREAT plot twists, interesting characters and epic. And, … I wonder what Hillary thought/said when she found out the news concerning Palin?

{ Comments }

Ann Coulter Attacks Joe Biden

by Randy on August 28, 2008

I watched the speech last night and I wondered why Joe went on and on about his family but why he didn’t mention his Dad? That is a true thought that came to mind during his speech. His Mom was cute … she obviously loved her son and was enjoying the moment. If he mentioned his Dad I don’t remember it.

I felt sympathy and shades of empathy for Senator Biden during his speech when he was talking about his home life and the tragedy of the early death of his first wife. His son was amazingly moving when recounting his memories of his Dad during that time. However, there has always been something about Biden that just hit me as a little fake. I am not sure I quite believe everything else he is saying.

Now … Ann is … well … Ann. She really tears into him regarding the allegations of plagiarism against him. Here she is on a part of his family life he didn’t share. The quote and more thoughts after the jump.

[click to continue...]

{ Comments }

Anti Obama Propaganda

by Randy on July 1, 2008

propaganda.jpg

A friend sent me the above artwork. While I love my friend and not sure why they sent it on, I don’t think it is funny. I don’t care for these four powerful symbols being combined in such a manner.

I don’t like Obama’s policies and think he would be a disaster for this country. His judgmental comment, while in poor taste, deserves a better response than the one above.

I will bear arms because I can for my own reasons. I don’t cling to religion out of bitterness, I embrace Christ out of joy. I love who Uncle Sam really is, a symbol of patriotism and the Constitution is one of the best man made documents to *ever* be drafted to facilitate freedom.

Perhaps Obama thinks a little to highly of himself, I don’t know. Perhaps the artist of the above graphic might think a little more highly of their positions than to reduce them to such a negative context.

{ Comments }

Marriage Amendments in FL and CA

by Randy on June 3, 2008

A friend forwarded me the poll from Quinnipiac University. The poll itself asked a lot of questions about the state of Florida politics but this was the one concerning the Marriage Amendment.

Quinnipac University Poll

[click to continue...]

{ Comments }

The Chattering Class

by Randy on April 14, 2008

Tonight I caught up on all the political news for the first time in about two weeks: Obama and Clinton are fighting like two cats in a burlap bag.  There are cries of “YOUR and ELITIST!  No…YOU’RE an ELITIST” being thrown around.

… and McCain is still old … and kinda’ funny.

::: sigh :::

Tonight I watched the dude filling in for Glenn Beck.  I forget his name but he is pretty good.  He mentioned that maybe this recent hullabaloo about Obama saying “elitist” things, about people with guns and having religion being “bitter,” is just something “the chattering class” finds interesting and that the average person may not care.

Which got me thinking … is this “chattering class” an expression of an elitist mindset?  The “chattering class” label seems to be a new meme being bandied about and I find it intriguing for some reason.  Maybe it’s an old label and I am just now noticing it but … its sticking out to me more than the no brainer story of politicians acting like elitists.

{ Comments }

My Thoughts on Rev. Wright

by Paul Webster on March 15, 2008

Being rich and white, I can’t help but be concerned with the remarks of Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Rev. Wright is the “retired” pastor of Trinity Unity Church of Christ in Chicago, the church that Barack Obama calls his home church.

It is true, I am white. And it is true, I am rich. I own a home and two cars, am sending my daughter to college, and afford luxuries like vacations, expensive exercise equipment, nice furniture and other things I really don’t need. While things have been tight from time to time in my life, I have never gone to bed hungry, always lived in a home with heating and sometimes air conditioning, and sometimes throw away perfectly good things. I buy too many clothes, too much food, and too much music.

I have written laws and advised law makers and am committed to our way of government, culture, and society. Some may call me a bureaucrat or a political insider. When my son complains about “The Man” I quickly remind him that I am “The Man.”

Therefore, with that understanding of who I am, I was taken aback by the comments recently brought to light from the Reverend Jeremiah Wright. On the YouTube video I watched, I felt that Rev. White was pretty angry with me and people like me. It also seems that his congregation is pretty happy that the Reverend is communicating his feelings and thoughts on people like me.

But regardless of what Rev. Wright says about me and my demographic, what really bothers me is how his words affect the Gospel of Jesus Christ. As my co-worker commented after seeing his sermon, “This is why Christianity sucks.”

According to Rev. Wright, Jesus’ message is one of social and political liberation. He describes his own theology as “Black Liberation Theology.” I don’t know what that is, but am not inclined to find out since it seems to tolerate such blatantly factual errors about Jesus and the time and circumstances in which he lived.

For example, the Romans did not control everything. They did not control the Jewish religion. They allowed the Jews to maintain their customs and their religious practices. Indeed, they allowed the Jews to maintain their culture.

Jesus, while perhaps being of a different skin color from the Romans and certainly of the ruled rather than the ruling class, had few things to say about the Romans and their occupation. While he challenged Caesar’s claims of deity, he did not suggest that Romans were racist, unjust, or worthy of disdain because they were “rich, white people” and were subjecting the Jews to occupation and tribute.  In fact, Jesus disabuses the notion that his ministry was about establishing a new political kingdom and overthrowing the Romans.

Jesus’ harshest words were hardly aimed at the Romans. In fact, he praised a number of Romans who demonstrated great faith. Rather, Jesus’ target of most of his anger and criticism were aimed at the Jewish leaders of his own people because they used religion to manipulate the people and distorted who God really is.

In response to my co-worker, I said “No, this is why Reverend Wright’s notion of Christianity suck.”

{ Comments }

The Educated Electorate

by Paul Webster on March 6, 2008

An oft quoted requirement for a free democracy is an educated electorate. At no time is that more evident than now as critical decisions and strategies unfold in the 08 presidential campaign.

With the conclusions of the Ohio and Texas primaries where the nation saw millions of cross-over voters gaming the system, it is clear that the sophistication of voters is evident. In my view, however, is it too little too late?

According to some pundits, there is no way that Hillary can overcome Obama’s lead in delegates unless the “Clinton mystique” has its way over the Democrat super delegates. And that would put the Clintons in direct conflict w/ Nancy Pelosi. Pelosi has stated that the voters will decide the nominee not party leaders at the Democrat convention. We shall see.

Notwithstanding the drama in the Democrat party, the notion of Barak becoming the nominee worries me greatly. The fact that such an inexperienced policy light-weight is a hair’s breadth from the presidency is terrifying. And this causes me to reflect on the level of education of the American electorate.

Recently, a California court ruled against a homeschooling family saying that putting their children in public school is in the best interest of the children. Worldnet Daily has a terribly confusing article about the decision but it points out the obvious that, in many instances, the government is actually working against individual freedom and exerting too much control over education.

On the other hand, I recently I spoke at a wonderful Christian private school in a very wealthy Southern California community. Among the examples I used was that of Terri Shiavo, the Florida woman starved to death by her husband with the support of the Florida courts a few years ago. I don’t think any of the students or faculty recalled the national issue that was in the news every single day almost exactly three years ago. After my presentation, my wife and best source of feedback, said that I spoke over the heads of the audience and that I failed to use enough “Christianese” for them to track with me. In my view, privately educated young people are the only hope for the preservation of knowledge but this worried me.

Maybe I’m stretching a bit too much, but is there a connection here? The poor products of a poor education leads to poor choices in the leadership of our country. Please America, prove me wrong.

{ Comments }

BarackaMilli ObamaNilli

by Randy on February 15, 2008

I am having way to much fun a the expense of Obama’s name lately …

Pajamas Media: What Barack Obama and Milli Vanilli Have in Common
Barack Obama is all image and no substance, writes Bob Owens. And forget “change.” He’s just lip-synching the old liberal standards.

by Bob Owens

Fresh off of impressive wins in the District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia, Illinois Senator Barack Obama seems poised to ride his campaign mantra of “change” to the Democratic presidential nomination, with a very real possibility of becoming America’s first black president. His rock star — excuse me, “Barack star” — hype aside, however, he is running a campaign on ideas and ideals firmly rooted in old-school, well-monied, liberal culture.

Obama’s political background is cryptic, and perhaps purposefully so. Recent attempts to find some substance in his legal and academic background have come up empty. His record of voting “present” while in the Illinois Senate instead of taking a position on tough issues is well-known. Democratic focus groups that wildly favor Obama over Hillary Clinton could not list a single legislative accomplishment for the senator, and instead admitted of Obama that “you don’t get the substance. You only get froth and apologies.”

To date, Obama’s masterful rhetorical skills have wooed voters across the political spectrum, but for those of us who grew up in the late 1980s and early 1990s, we may well be advised to start considering Obama as the “Milli Vanilli candidate.”

You remember Milli Vanilli, don’t you? Or are you still trying to forget? …

Go read the whole thing.  I think it is unfortunate to compare Obama to Milli Vanilli.  They were a complete sham whereas Obama is sharing what I truly believe he believes is the best for the country.  I also think it is unfortunate because those guys were humiliated the world over and I don’t like it when people continue to berate them.  Especially after one of them has committed suicide.

Back to Obama, … his flimsy substance?  He is completely in line with liberal left of left leanings but he is the first liberal to truly start using messaging that reaches across generations, political parties, race and gender in a compelling way.  People rightly criticize him for being all talk and no game (not much to date at least) but the power of words to compel the masses to action … like it or not … is substantial.

[click to continue...]

{ Comments }

Third Party Viability

by Randy on February 14, 2008

I am ok with voting for McCain. I am praying for a miracle Huckabee win but … I am ok with voting for McCain. He irritates me and I don’t trust him on some issues. I do see him as a fixture of the “establishment.” That said, I like that he would keep us safe in the war on terror, is pro-life and will appoint conservative Judges.

But … once Hillarack Obamaton (sounds like a transformer huh?) is defeated… like the very next day… I am hoping that a truly viable third party will develop for the 2010 elections and especially by 2012.

I’ve just about had it with both parties. They are too comfortable and manipulative.

{ Comments }

This is outrageous.  Read the whole thing.

Thanks for the heads up Greg.

{ Comments }